The firm

Danilo Sacchi

Danilo Sacchi works on matters where an investor has requested redemption, withdrawal or repayment and the counterparty has not paid. He reviews the underlying documents, maps the applicable procedural routes, and sets out what a claim would need to establish before any correspondence is sent. His work sits at the point where a client's file becomes a legal position rather than a grievance.

How the work looks

The starting point is always the paper trail: subscription agreements, custody statements, correspondence around the refusal, and whatever the counterparty has said or not said in response. Danilo works through this material to identify whether the claim is contractual or proprietary in nature, what jurisdiction the dispute is likely to sit in, and what a competent authority for that dispute would need to see. This assessment happens before any demand is drafted or any deadline is set.

Where the file involves digital assets, the review extends to transaction records and platform disclosures, following the same logic used in the firm's digital evidence checklist for refusal to redeem. Clients and advisers who reach this stage are usually deciding whether to engage a firm at all; that decision, and the broader picture of how refusal cases are handled, is covered on the refusals page.